Thursday, October 13, 2011

You Can't Avoid Boyd - The Big Bang Sack Theory


The Big Bang Sack Theory

It’s a common situation. Everybody has a friend that hooks up with the same person from time to time. Despite their sexual relationship, both people claim they are not dating each other. I can deal with that, but there is one pressing question: What do you call this person? Booty call? That would work if it was 1998. A friend with benefits? That is more boring than this season of “The Office”. Fuck buddy? That’s too vulgar for most. Allow me to introduce the correct term for this person: bang sack.
I can’t take credit for this name. Stains came up with the name. However, I am going to give this thing life and let it grow before our very eyes. If you don’t think I am capable of that, you don’t know Boyd. In 2004, I made it socially acceptable at the Bloomsburg University to end every sentence with the word “son”. It caught like wildfire. To this day, I don’t have to buy a drink in Sewell, NJ as they know me as “The Original Son” in those parts.
Here is how you should classify your relationship with your sexcapades friend:

· One night stand: Your typical wham, bam, thank you ma’am. Hit it and quit it. One and done. Insert generic “I just had sex and need to get the hell out of here” saying here.
· Two night stand: A bang so nice, you did it twice. For whatever reason (alcohol), you both decide to give it another go. No one can fault you for making the same mistake again.
· Bang sack: If you have sex with the same person more than twice, that person is a bang sack, your favorite prostitute, or a person you are dating. There are no exceptions. It’s just a physical relationship based on the naughty, that’s it. Nothing romantic about it. You and your bang sack can go out in public together like friends would. You are friends, friends who see each other naked at the end of the night or the next morning or decide to partake in some form of afternoon delight. If feelings get involved, then you two are in a relationship.

If I come across as crude, so be it. I am just pointing out the facts. I am not hating on the bang sack either. I love the theory of the bang sack. Personally, I don’t believe a person can just be a bang sack in the long run; someone will eventually want a relationship. However, most people would disagree with that thought and I know a few people who are currently proving me wrong. If Pete Jamowski can keep pulling it off, I may have to re-evaluate my thoughts on this. To quote 1980’s philosopher Rocky Balboa after he ended the Cold War: “If I can change, and you can change, everybody can change.”
In conclusion, long live the bang sack sonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn.

          -Written by Marcus Boyd 

Monday, October 10, 2011

Rec Center vs. Fitness Center

                 I recently started working out again at a local Rec Center. What I realized in the first week of working out really made me think. What are some of the benefits of working out at a big Fitness Center as opposed to a local Rec Center? What are some of the benefits of working out at a local Rec Center as opposed to a big Fitness Center? The pros and cons might surprise you, then again they might not. We'll see how it goes.
          
                First I'll start in the locker room. I go to the gym after work and need to get changed into some workout clothes. Well, in a large Fitness Center you'll find lockers, toilets, showers and whatever else you'd expect to find. In my local Rec Center you'll find the same things in addition to a sauna. So, they are basically the same in the locker room. However, the way people act is a little different. Large Fitness Centers are all about working out. You go into the locker room to change, then you get out. After the workout maybe you shower, get changed and get out. In a Rec Center it's more laid back. By laid back I mean that every old man in there likes to walk around naked. To the shower, from the shower, to the toilets, from the toilets. Sometimes they just stand there with their towel over their shoulder letting it all hang out. I don't know why they feel it's appropriate but it's gross. 

              Next we'll go into the weight room. This is where the differences really stand out. At least in my case. A large Fitness Center has stacks and stacks or free weights with benches galore to use them on. They are nautilus machines all over the place and you can do whatever exercise you need to do when you need to do it. In a Rec Center, or at least in my Rec Center, there is one rack of free weights and three benches to use them on. There are two nautilus machines and you may or may not be able to do the exercise you want when you want to do it. Rec Centers place a little more emphasis on the atmosphere and with the average age of the members being around 84 years old, they don't really need all those weights. The amount of people in the weight room at one time is significantly lower in a Rec Center as well. Which is good and bad. Good because you have more room to move around, and you won't feel as if someone is always watching you. It's bad because they odds of seeing a hot little number working out are really low. In fact, I've been working out there for a week now and I've seen zero hot little numbers working out.

               Another thing that goes along with the above paragraph is, being in my lower late 20's, I'm one of the fittest guys in there. It really makes a difference when you're working out and don't have to look at the meat heads lifting a thousand pounds right next to you. That would have to go into the pros column for the Rec Center, but not seeing hot chicks working out is in the cons column so it's really tough. What is more important? Getting a good workout and feeling good about it? Or, seeing hot chicks in workout clothes getting the most out of their kickbacks? I know, I know it's tough. I'm going to go against the grain here and say the workout is more important. It sounds kinda gay, but I'm sorry it's just the truth.

              What about the staff? In a Rec Center the staff is comprised of local kids or residents that are just looking for a job. Maybe they have some kind of exercise background, probably not. Large Fitness Centers have very knoledgeable staff that are willing to help out if need be. I would have to give the edge to Fitness Centers on this one, but I don't really need the staff for anything so it doesn't matter to me.

              I didn't tally them up and I don't intend to but overall I would say I like working out at a local Rec Center instead of a large Fitness Center. My Rec Center also has a 12, 25 meter swimming pool which is an awesome after a hard weight training workout. So I'll continue to enjoy my local Rec Center with all the old people and inappropriate nudity. I'll also continue to enjoy going to the IHOP in Ballston and getting a Hand-job for a Ham Sandwich out back from the Spanish speaking staff.

Thursday, October 6, 2011

You Can't Avoid Boyd - Dropping the H-Bomb


Dropping the H-Bomb

Monday Night Football has always started for me with Hank Williams Jr. screaming “Are you ready for some football?!?!”, and then breaking into his football-altered country hit “All My Rowdy Friends Are Coming Over Tonight". Well, it is safe to say we will never hear that intro ever again. On Monday morning, Williams Jr. made some controversial comments on the TV show “Fox & Friends”. When talking about a planned gold outing with Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner and Democrat President Barack Obama, Williams Jr. said “That would be like Hitler playing golf with (current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu. Not hardly. In the shape this country is in?” When the hosts asked for clarification on the analogy, Williams Jr. mentioned how many people considered Obama the enemy and that he was comparing the President to the leader of the Aryan Nation. ESPN decided to pull his MNF intro from this week’s game and distanced themselves from the hullabaloo. Late Monday night, Hank Williams Jr. issued a statement saying his comments were “misunderstood” and he was just trying to make a comment on how ridiculous the pairing was and how he respects the President.

This is not the first Adolf Hitler comment to get someone in trouble. When talking about how then-current Michigan football coach Rich Rodriguez was a good leader despite his bad coaching record in 2008, ESPN broadcaster Lou Holtz sarcastically said “Ya know, Hitler was a good leader too.” Holtz backtracked immediately from the comment and issued an apology the next day. He was not reprimanded, unlike ESPN columnist Jemele Hill. Hill was suspended from her ESPN article when she posted the following editorial on how she could not root for the Boston Celtics in the 2008 playoffs: "Rooting for the Celtics is like saying Hitler was a victim.” Megan Fox was fired from the “Transformers” movie series when she compared director Michael Bay to Hitler.

Celebrities need to stop mentioning Hitler’s name. I understand what Williams Jr. meant with his analogy (I don’t understand his explanation afterwards.) It was a very awkward pairing. I understand what Lou Holtz meant. Hitler was effective at leading men. Unfortunately, it was for the most fucked up reason of all time. No matter how appropriate the comment may be, bringing up Hitler is always going to come off in poor taste and allow people to think you are comparing that person to the man who tried to eliminate the Jews. Even if that is not the intent of the comparison, it is how it appears. Hitler even ruined the little mustache look. Despite Michael Jordan’s attempt to make it stylish, it was always be referenced to Germany’s most famous failed artist. Hitler equals bad, it’s as simple as that. Just like Schiavo means not moving or Cleary means secret fag.
              -Written by Marcus Boyd

Thursday, September 29, 2011

You Can't Avoid Boyd - Money Talks, Bullshit Walks


Money Talks, Bullshit Walks

Last weekend, the long anticipated baseball movie “Moneyball” made its national debut. The producers did a good job having Brad Pitt star as the main role in an attempt to please bored wives/girlfriends/dates as they were dragged to the theaters by their significant other (I knew better to bring my girlfriend to this movie and have to explain Scott Hatteberg to her for two hours.) The movie has allowed sports fans to revisit the 2003 best-selling book of the same name, written by Michael Lewis, and the entire concept of “Moneyball”.

I will try to keep this concept very basic and not nerd it up: The Oakland A’s (along with a few other teams) determined in the early 2000s that the statistics and strategies most of baseball used to develop their baseball teams were flawed. For example, stolen bases and runs batted in (RBIs). A guy with 100 RBIs, they argued, wasn’t necessarily a good player, just an average player fortunate to have the opportunity to hit with runners on. The A’s and their general manager, Billy Beane, focused on on-base percentage and slugging percentage, a foreign concept at the time. They knew with their limited payroll, they had to draft and sign misfits who would be overlooked by most teams due to their evident deficiencies but got on base and/or can hit with power regularly. Richer teams, like the Yankees, could afford to sign players to rich contracts and not have it work out. The A’s had to be smart with their money and couldn’t afford any mistakes. Baseball scouts weren’t that important in this concept, statistics were. They refused to draft high schoolers because they typically flamed out as opposed to more established college players. They also drafted players earlier than expected since they fit into their system and would accept cheaper contracts.

The A’s had a seven year run from 2000-2006 where they were a playoff contender annually. They made the playoffs five years, and advanced to one championship series. Since 2006, they have struggled to be .500 team. Some of the players chronicled in the book have enjoyed success in baseball. Others have not. You would have thought Jeremy Brown (or Fat Jeremy Brown as the author referred to him as) would have been the second coming of Jesus if you read the book. He enjoyed a few call-ups in the majors before retiring.

My main complaint about the “Moneyball” concept is I don’t believe it’s even a revolutionary concept. While the idea has the potential to neutralize the playing field, it never really has. The A’s enjoyed some success, but lost most of their playoff games. Sure, they were competitive against the richer teams (Yankees and Red Sox) in their playoff matchups, but could never beat them. Eventually, the misfits became too valuable for their contracts and moved on to more lucrative contracts elsewhere. If the A’s would have won a World Series, I’d understand the hoopla about “Moneyball”. Instead, the A’s slightly overachieved and never won anything meaningful.

More teams are incorporating on-base percentage and slugging into their strategies, but haven’t abandoned the old way completely. I applaud Billy Beane for his innovating thinking, but I’m not ready to label him a genius. Ideas can only be great if they get results. Unfortunately, this idea came up short on results. It allowed them to compete, but they still never ended up with a ring. I’m sorry Brad Pitt, you will not be getting my $25. It will go towards the Rocky VII fund.
            -Written by Marcus Boyd

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

The American Dream - A Success Story

             Good afternoon Ham Sandwich eaters. This won't be long. I want to get a post up between "You Can't Avoid Boyd" posts. Marcus' new post will be up tomorrow morning. I just have something I'd like to say. I was inspired today at work by my boss and would like to sum up his story real quick.

            I won't use his name for whatever reason you wouldn't use someone's name in a post. Let's just call him Ricky, which is kinda funny because he is Vietnamese. And I know what you're thinking but just read on and check out what this guy went through.

           Ricky was born in Vietnam to a very wealthy family. His grandfather was from France and owned a significant amount of land in Southern Vietnam. Ricky had a nanny and chauffeur growing up, so it wasn't the typical Vietnamese upbringing you're thinking of. However, curiosity took over and as a young teenager he moved away from the cushy life and began to live the life of a peasant. This lasted a few years until young Ricky was old enough to move to the U.S.A. and try to make something of himself.

           The move was successful and it wasn't long before little Ricky was a member of the United States Air Force. While a member of the Air Force, Ricky decided to become a pilot. His philosophy was; if you're going to do it, do it big! Well, I made that up but it fits. Either way, as a pilot during the Vietnam War, Ricky was sent back to his home country armed with bombs and missiles. Because he came over to the U.S. to make something of himself, the thought of bombing his home country was a necessary stepping stone. He knew how bad the communists were up North and was obligated to complete his mission. He did so with success until he was shot down near Hanoi. Hanoi was the most popular city in North Vietnam as was home to the notorious Hanoi Hilton. The Hanoi Hilton was a POW camp not known for customer service, if you get my drift. In case you don't get my drift. They treated those guys like shit, then they beat them, then they treated them worse.

            It was a typical move by anyone with captured enemies. You promise all kinds of cool stuff and maybe even give them some privileges in exchange for information. What you might not know is what they did after they got the information they wanted. They killed them. Straight up. If you didn't give in they would just continue to beat you and do other weird stuff. You were still useful if you had info. Once you gave it up there was no reason to have you anymore so they just killed you. Sounds like Boyd's philosophy with women. Anyway, Ricky dealt with the abuse for over 3 years until a POW release was agreed upon and he was able to return home.

            After that he got out of the service and used his incredible knowledge and work ethic to continue down the right path. Ricky became an Electronic Engineer and went on to work for the U.N. (United Nations) and the Pentagon. What he did with them is irrelevant, but as an electronics technician I'll tell you, it was very impressive. After continuing to better himself he sponsored his entire family so they could enjoy the freedoms of the United States. With his family here and a career on the right track maybe it was time to shut it down and cruise to retirement?

           No, Ricky wasn't satisfied with his role as an engineer and went to the management side. While a manager he brought an entire operation to his new company and continues to expand. Thanks to Ricky's success I was able to land a job with him. I have learned a lot already and I continue to learn every day. He actually just told me last week that he has his own business and is two years away from putting out a product. That's crazy to me and there are a few reasons why.

           First of all. This guy is a very small Vietnamese man. It was his incredible drive and willingness to do what he had to that allowed his to succeed. Growing up in Vietnam, coming to the U.S.A., going back to Vietnam as an Air Force Bomber, getting shot down and captured, spending over 3 years in a prison camp, coming back to the U.S., starting a new career and a family, bringing his whole Vietnamese family over here (legally) and continuing to better himself is just an incredible story. Second of all, I want you to look around at all the people out there that have everything handed to them. How are they doing? They lack the drive and will power to really make something of themselves. I'm not saying that I'm doing everything I need to do. I can do better and I know that. What bothers me are all the people that grow up in the greatest country in the world and just throw it away. They coast through life with no purpose or goals. Maybe a prison camp isn't the answer but it's a start.

           I am lucky man to have landed a job with a manager like this. He inspires me to apply myself a little more. I mean if this little Asian can do what he did then why can't I? I wanted to share this with you in hopes you'd get a little inspiration from it. If not, then you're probably just coasting towards the middle. Good luck with that, I'm setting my goals a little higher. Another important point of this story, because I enjoy the better things in life even though I can't always afford them, is this; he owns a Porsche, a Corvette, a really nice truck, a gorgeous watch and a lot of other really cool stuff around the house. When he told me about that, he simply said, "I worked very hard to get where I am and now I'm enjoying the better things in life." Speaking of that, I'm going to step it up. I'm going to take my Ham Sandwich around my neighborhood and get a Hand-job from someone that can close their door behind them. (they have a house)

Thursday, September 22, 2011

You Can't Avoid Boyd - Limeys Heart Mark Zuckerberg


Limeys Heart Mark Zuckerberg

Last week, the Science Museum of England released the results of a month long poll they had been conducting. In conjunction with their newest display “Water Wars: Fighting the Food Crisis in the World Today”, 3,000 British adults were asked what they couldn’t live without (it appears basic food, shelter, basic clothing, and electricity were assumed for this poll.) Here is the top ten with other notable results:

1. Sunshine
2. Internet connection
3. Clean drinking water
4. Fridge
5. Facebook
6. National Health Service (or what Americans call insurance)
7. Cooker
8. Email
9. Flushing toilet
10. Mobile phone/smartphone

11. Tea/Coffee

15. Painkillers

22. Google

23. Car

24. Hair straighteners

27. Chocolate

35. Ebay

41. Spell Check

43. Pushup Bra

50. Twitter

You can view the full list here (http://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/about_us/press_and_media/press_releases/2011/09/Feeling%20Flush.aspx) but some observations I noticed. First off, sunshine at #1?!? Really??? Have you ever met a British person with a tan? Is it even possible? Those wankers are paler than Caylee Anthony. Second, those polled would rather have Facebook than insurance, a working toilet, or any form of transportation. I realize it must be important to know the birthday of someone you haven’t talked to since you two were in kindergarten years ago, but that seems ridiculous. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a fan of Facebook. I go on regularly and am a fan of “The Social Network”. However, I’d rather have a car or use a light bulb (#40 on the list.) Most Brits would rather poke a Facebook friend and make a twosie in a hole than use a toilet, ignorant of their friends’ status. British people love technology as it dominated 20% of the top 50. I tried to check with my British friends to see if this was true for all people across the pond, but Dennis’ mom was too wasted to get back to me and Adam Welch won’t respond to my emails. Also, I’m not surprised caffeine was that high as there appears to be a Starbucks on every block. Painkillers at #15 surprised me unless some of my friends took this poll. Then, I’m surprised it wasn’t higher (literally).

If I were asked this question, here would be my ten answers in no particular order:

Flat screen TV- I would need it for…

Direct TV- Where else can you watch Steven Seagal movies on a random afternoon?

Clean Water- If you lived with me, you know I drink about a jug of water a night. In fact, the jug has been nicknamed “Agent Jug Bauer” by others. It was a better roommate than Niedermeyer.

Working Toilet- I don’t want to poop into a hole in the ground.

Car- Public transportation is for jerks and lesbians.

Internet- Home of the information superhighway (a.k.a. porn).

Alcohol- Ben Franklin said beer is proof God loves us and wants to make us happy. Amen to that.

Barbecue Grill- I grill every day all year round, not just the summer. Nothing says good times like grilling in a snowstorm.

Ketchup- I put ketchup on anything socially acceptable, even a few things that would disgust some of you.

Major League Baseball- I need one sport in my life and baseball runs the longest. The NFL just missed the cut.
             
               -Written by Marcus Boyd

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Don't Ask, Don't Tell - Good or Bad?

                   Don't Ask, Don't Tell. That was the United States Military's policy when it came to homosexuals in the Armed Forces. What that means is, you can be in the military if you are gay as long as nobody knows about it. You can't be asked if you are gay, and you are not allowed to tell anyone that you are gay. Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Get it? Well as of today, September 20th 2011, that policy is no more. Homosexuals are allowed to be open and up front with their sexual preference. This is a huge win for gay rights and should be celebrated. However, is this really the best thing for our military?

                 Equality should be universal and it's something that I support fully. What worries me about this policy coming to an end is human nature and overwhelming ignorance. In a perfect world, this policy ending will have no adverse effects and everyone will carry on like normal. Unfortunately, we are not in a perfect world and allowing gay service members to be out and honest about their sexual preference will have negative affects where we really don't need them. Right on the front lines.

                 I'm going to break down the military into three groups. Infantry - these are the guys (females are not allowed to be in the infantry) that go on patrols, go behind enemy lines, look for the bad guys and do a majority of the fighting. FOBbits - These are the men and women that stay on the FOB (Forward Operating Base) and do whatever their job might be in support of the soldiers going outside the wire. Support and Security - These are the men and women that go outside the wire to provide support, security and various other duties that put them in harms way. Each of these groups have a very important job and cannot function without the other. They have been working together with minimal friction and with one goal in mind. WIN! Don't ask don't tell coming to an end will affect each group differently. Here's how.

                I would like to emphasize that each of these groups will be talked about when they are in the war zone and under a great deal of pressure. Don't think because I call them FOBbits they are living on easy street and out of harms way. There is a constant risk of mortar attack or random gunfire that looms over everyone, all the time.

               That being said, let's start with the FOBbits. If your job is a mechanic, a nurse, a cook, or any other job that keeps you on the FOB for a majority of your time, the end of don't ask don't tell won't have too much of an affect on you. For example, I was a member of the Electronics Section and spent a good deal of my time on the FOB fixing electronic equipment. I called my section Sergeant a fag all the time and if it turned out that he actually was gay, it wouldn't have changed how I did my job. For most of the FOBbits, their job is straight forward and the sexual orientation of their boss won't affect how well they perform. Whether they agree with that person's life choice is another story. But we are talking about the soldier's ability to effectively do their job. This policy ending will have minimal affects on the FOBbit group.

              We are going to move to the Support and Security group. This group is made up of the Engineers that go out and fix roads and move rubble. They also provide security and do patrols. Another member of this group are the men and women pulled from other units to provide convoy security, drive trucks, help with detainees and whatever else might take them off the FOB. The soldiers in this group have more interaction with each other and that allows them to be more tolerant in general. However, when completing their task there is enormous pressure to follow commands and trust the person in charge. If you don't do what you're told when you're told to do it, somebody can get killed. That's a fact. All the time spent training and preparing for situations that might come up allow these soldiers to form a bond and build trust. If you don't trust the person who is in charge of you, it's going to be very difficult to follow them into harms way. This policy will directly affect these soldiers whether you like it or not. For every person out there that supports equality, there are probably two people that don't. The jobs performed by these soldiers are relatively straight forward and a particular soldier's responsibility is known with some gray areas to account for the unexpected. That makes it a little easier on the soldiers involved because they know what their job is and it's not going to change because their commanding officer is gay. It will affect them if shit hits the fan and there is a lack of trust. Why is there a lack of trust you ask? Because you've been training and working with the same people for a while and now you find out that one of them is gay. For most of us, it's no big deal. It's not the "most of us" I'm worried about. I'm worried about the few or more that are not comfortable with openly gay soldiers. With the don't ask don't tell policy, that never came up. Yes, you'd have your suspicions but without confirmation it wouldn't affect your day-to-day life. Allowing soldiers to be be openly gay will affect the day-to-day life of a number of members of the military. It will be felt the most in the next group we talk about. The Infantry.

               I'm not going to sugar coat this. Allowing infantry soldiers to be openly gay will have a negative affect on how well the job gets done. Period. You have to understand how the infantry works. These guys spend a ridiculous amount of time together. They eat together, they sleep together, they shower together, they train together and they fight together. They have a bond with each other that most of us can't even grasp. The level of trust between infantry guys is, and needs to be, very strong. And let's be honest; if you were showering with a guy for the past two years and now you find out he's gay, it's going to change things. How it changes things will vary from one soldier to the next but change is inevitable. More importantly, if you've perceived someone a certain way for a long time and built up a level of trust and respect, that will change when you find out they are gay. These infantry guys need to be able to trust each other without thinking about it. They need to know that what they are being told is the right thing to do without question. If they second guess it, someone could get killed. These guys are going to have the overall trust and bond they've built up over the years altered significantly. It sounds bad, and you can say it won't matter until you're blue in the face. And for you, it might not. But these units are big and we need to think about everyone this affects. Even the ignorant and intolerant. This is how the world works and that's just the way it is. I'd love to live in a Utopia where everything works out for the best. But we don't and we need to realize how this affects everybody, good and bad.

               Now, a person being gay doesn't hinder their ability to do their job. Don't take this the wrong way. I'm not saying gay infantry soldiers are any less capable of performing on a high level, I'm saying that when they come out in the open about, it's going change how the entire unit operates. The reason is, there are just too many people out there that are not comfortable with homosexuals. Infantry guys, for the most part, are the gung-ho meat heads that fart on each other and wrestle. They don't have the exposure to the outside world that everyone else does. The close proximity that these guys live in will become very uncomfortable very quickly. It all comes down to trusting your battle buddy and I can't see how this policy coming to an end will do any good for the infantry guys on the front lines.

              I want to reiterate the fact that a gay soldier is just as capable of doing their job than anyone else. When it comes to job performance and ability, being gay has nothing to do with it. I know a lot of soldiers that were gay and I would have them next to me in a fox-hole any day of the week because they were damn good soldiers. I support equality and feel that everyone has the right to live their life the way they want, with whoever they want. What I think we overlooked here is how different the military is from any other work place in the world. I understand that these soldiers want to be honest and open about who they are. What I also understand is that when you join the Armed Forces you take on a higher responsibility to your Country. I wouldn't be surprised if the gay soldiers serving in the Infantry remain unnoticed for the greater good of their unit and their country. I hope I'm wrong and everything carries on without issues.

            Feel free to voice your opinions on this matter. I'm curious to know how people feel about this. And be honest, I was. Now I'm going to head down to the recruiters office with a Ham Sandwich and ask for and tell about the Hand-job I get for it.